The Lambeth Whitewash

Ezekiel 13 v10-12
They lead my people astray, saying, “Peace,” when there is no peace, and because, when a flimsy wall is built, they cover it with whitewash, therefore tell those who cover it with whitewash that it is going to fall. Rain will come in torrents, and I will send hailstones hurtling down, and violent winds will burst forth. When the wall collapses, will people not ask you, “Where is the whitewash you covered it with?”

The word of God is uncompromising. Like a sharp double-edged sword, it is intended to cleave truth from error, cutting beneath our obfuscations, our evasions, our deceits and outright denials. It is intended to bring us face to face with the truth, the reality we hide from day to day. And it is only after we are confronted with the truth of who we are, in sharp painful honesty, that it offers us hope – a hope beyond all hope.

Where do we, as Anglicans, stand in relation to this? It is a tragedy that Lambeth – where the Church called the Anglican Communion, faced with a crossroads, gathered together for counsel – should have failed so deeply in purpose, in leadership, in clarity and in moral courage. Rather than discerning the truth through the uncompromising word of God and then acting upon it, the ‘truth’ discussed was weak, distorted and nuanced, and no courage was found to act upon it.

2 Corinthians 6 v14
Do not be yoked together with unbelievers. For what do righteousness and wickedness have in common? Or what fellowship can light have with darkness?

What does this passage teach us other than, having discerned between righteousness and wickedness, we should act upon that discernment? Or do we not have the courage of the convictions that our faith lays upon us? Jesus said His yoke is light – but a yoke it is nonetheless. Those who profess faith in Him must wear this yoke.

We should not love the organisation so much that we forget that the organisation exists only at the pleasure and for the purposes of God. A comfortable time for Bishops, a collegiality expressed, may be all well and good, but if it is at the expense of the body of Christ, it is little more than soothing platitudes offered to a sick patient by those who have the ability and authority to direct the cure.

Revelation 3 v15-16
I know your deeds, that you are neither cold nor hot. I wish you were either one or the other! So, because you are lukewarm—neither hot nor cold—I am about to spit you out of my mouth.

Revelation 2 v5b
If you do not repent, I will come to you and remove your lampstand from its place.

The words of the gentle Christ – meek and mild. Far be it for Him to overturn the money tables, and whip the interlopers out of the temple! Which Christ would we follow? The real Christ as revealed in the Bible? Or would we prefer a Christ who would hide behind platitudes, behind circumlocution, behind collegiality, behind committees and behind an organisation?

We are told that the Lambeth conference was expressly designed not to make decisions, but to rebuild trust and confidence in Anglicanism. Well, what do we make of this? Regarding the first aim, we must adjudge it a success. No decisions could have been passed in a meeting so manipulated to achieve nothing of significance.

Regarding the second aim, rebuilding ‘trust and confidence’, perhaps we may answer with a question. On what foundation is Anglicanism based? Should we rejoice in the friendship amongst Bishops, or should we desire the friendship of Christ? Without the Cornerstone, the rest is mere chasing after the wind.

Let us submit then, that in as much as the conference aims were towards a lukewarm outcome, they were remarkably successful. As an example of an abdication of responsibility and authority, Lambeth ended on a high note.

So what now? It is hard to escape the conclusion that the lampstand now passes to others who will be willing to make the hard decisions and difficult choices that will lead to the restoration of the sick patient and the eventual repair of the tear in the fabric of the life of the Church.

Posted in Anglican, Christian | 3 Comments

Writing on the age to come

One of the challenges of blog writing is keeping the thing up to date. That’s particularly the case in running a blog that is intentionally prophetic in character. For it to be so, it requires reflection and prayer and time with the Lord, which does not always sync well with the ‘feed me’ blog culture.

I’ve toyed with the idea of turning this into more static content, such as a web site, and that may happen in the future. For now, it shall remain as a blog but possibly not be updated at the normal frequency of one. That is to say, if I have an insight or a word that I think might be of some value, and have the time and space to post it, then I’ll do so. Otherwise, things shall remain as they are. I’ll no longer be succumbing to that ‘post because I haven’t posted in a while’ pressure!

In either case, the blog remains open – feel free to post comment.

Blessings,

Peter

Posted in Uncategorized | 6 Comments

Prophetic words

Below is an compliation of prophetic words posted here over the last couple of years. I hope it blesses and strengthens you.

For me, it is a time to rest and seek the Lord more deeply. We are currently in the process of moving, which may well be true spiritually as well as physically, and it is a good time to take a step back and seek His heart. I’ll still be about, but I’m not planning on updating here for a while. Any who would like to get in contact with me and don’t have my email address can contact my anonymous address at gs07liveblog (at) hotmail (dot) com – if I know you I’ll email back with my real address!

Blessings,

Peter

The window of grace – 26th March 2008.
The twilight of the current age – 7th February 2008.
The plumbline – 1st January 2008.
Trust – 22nd December 2007.
The mercy judgment – 16th September 2007.
The axe is at the foot of the tree – 12th July 2007.
Avalanche – 19th May 2007.
The story – 16th May 2007.
The 11th hour – 15th April 2007.
What is hidden will be revealed – 30th March 2007.
The fisherman – 10th March 2007.
The tree vision – 8th Marth 2007.
Desert – 25th February 2007.
False teachers – 7th February 2007.
Tsumani – 7th January 2007.
The heart of winter – 4th January 2007.
A storm is coming – 27th December 2006.
Do you not know who you are? – 13th December 2006.
The snake and the Church – 29th October 2006.
What if? – 27th October 2006.
The prayer of Jabez? – 22nd October 2006.
To run the race – 26th September 2006.
Such a time as this – 20th September 2006.
Ichabod – 13th September 2006.
The spirit of the age – 11th September 2006.

Posted in Christian, Prophecy | 5 Comments

Listening

“Nothing so effectually hinders hearing God’s voice as opening the heart too much to other voices. A heart too deeply interested in the news, the literature, and the society of this world cannot hear the divine voice. It needs stillness, retirement, and concentration to give God the heed He claims.” Andrew Murray, from the book ‘The Holiest of All’

This is something that I’ll be planning on doing this summer, God willing. More on that, shortly.

Posted in Christian | 3 Comments

Thought for the day….

“The weakness of so many modern Christians is that they feel too much at home in the world. In their effort to achieve restful adjustment to unregenerate society they have lost their pilgrim character and become an essential part of the very moral order against which they are sent to protest. The world recognizes them and accepts them for what they are. And this is the saddest thing that can be said about them. They are not lonely, but neither are they saints.” – A.W.Tozer

Posted in Christian, Prophecy | 4 Comments

More musing on judgment

Back in May I was musing on the nature of identity, sin and judgment and how we lack understanding of the latter because we do not fully perceive the former, wrapped up as it is in many more layers than simply the individual:

So often when calamity hits a country, some folks will say ‘this was the judgment of God’. Now, that may or may not be true, but the reply often critiques the seemingly random nature of the casualties – utilising the ‘this person was good so why did it happen to them?’ argument. We often cannot wrap our minds around this. However, once you understand identity and sin as multi-layered, then judgments that impact a country (say), start to be seen in a different light.

There’s another angle to this as well, again related to our identity:

…This explains why Paul says we were powerless. We were powerless not because humanity really wanted peace with God but we were held in bondage by Satan and sin against our will. No we were powerless because our wills, our desires, our hearts are naturally turned against God. We are held in bondage not against our will but by our will. Our hearts are the problem. Notice the quotation marks that run throughout this text [Romans 3:10-18]. Paul is not making this stuff up. He’s stringing together quotes from the Psalms and prophets of the Old Testament. This is God’s verdict regarding humanity: our hearts are hardened against him, we are bent on destroying him, each other, and the world he’s made.

God could then, without a hint of injustice, act in accordance with this verdict. When you read of God acting in judgment against a nation or an individual the thought should not be, how can God do this to these innocent people, but why hasn’t God judged everyone. Why haven’t we all shared the fate of the Canaanites, Hittites, and Jebusites?

And there is, again, a very clear answer. “While we were still powerless, Christ died for the ungodly.” …

Posted in Christian | 4 Comments

Vitriol

What I’m finding interesting following GAFCON from afar is the level of vitriol from the MSM. I wouldn’t have expected anything in the way of support, but the level of scorn is usually masked better than it is at present. Examples here, here and here. This I find encouraging, for you do not bother to attack what you do not consider a threat. The fact that the ‘world’ is so resolutely hating this has to be a hopeful sign. I say that cautiously, for I don’t support persecution complexes, however in this case I think it sticks.

(c/p from the Essentials blog)

Posted in Anglican | 2 Comments

Houses

FYI, updates have been a little more sparse recently, as we have been looking for something to buy or rent (our landlord wants to sell the house we are renting). These decisions work out as being painfully time intensive! Still, we’re hopeful that the end of the road is in sight…..

Posted in Uncategorized | 5 Comments

More intolerant tolerance

Back in April, I wrote about a Christian ministry in Canada that had its ability to remain distinctively Christian removed.

Different country, different month, same story:

A British-based Christian charity organization dedicated to aiding those with learning disabilities lost the right to control its own hiring practices after an Employee Tribunal ruled that it was “discriminatory.”

In a weekend ruling by the Tribunal of Abergele, North West Wales, the tribunal said that Prospects, a well-known charitable organization, could not require new or existing employees to sign and agree to a “religious ethos” or statement of faith in salvation through Jesus Christ.

Although the statement of faith did not require any standard of behavior in its employees other than to “work within both the Christian ethos and the policies of Prospects,” the tribunal ruled the charity’s statement of faith illegal because of its use of public funding.

Back in Canada our kangaroo ‘courts’ carry on bouncing on anything that seems to smack of WrongThought….

From here:

9th June – On Friday, the Alberta Human Rights Commission ordered Alberta pastor Stephen Boissoin to desist from expressing his views on homosexuality in any sort of public forum. He was also commanded to pay damages equivalent to $7,000 as a result of the tribunal’s November decision to side with complainant and homosexual activist Dr. Darren Lund. The tribunal has also called for Boissoin to personally apologize to Lund via a public statement in the local newspaper.

….

Most disturbingly, says Boissoin, is that the ruling calls for him to “cease publishing in newspapers, by email, on the radio, in public speeches, or on the internet, in future, disparaging remarks about gays and homosexuals.” Boissoin wondered to what extent the right to freedom of expression in Canada will be deteriorated, stating, “I am not allowed to hold on to my views.”

….

And here:

Saskatchewan Marriage Commissioner Fined For Refusing To “Marry” Homosexuals
He referred them to another commissioner but that was not acceptable to them

A Saskatchewan human rights tribunal has fined Regina marriage commissioner Orville Nichols $2,500 for refusing to “marry” two homosexual men who approached him for the ceremony in 2005.

Mr. Nichols told the two men, identified only as “M.J.” and his partner as “B.R.” in the court documents, he would not marry them because it went against his religious convictions as a devout Baptist, but referred them to another commissioner, Edna McCall, because he was aware that she would perform same sex marriages.

….

It’s pretty nifty if not only can you charge ’em after harassing, you can also charge ’em to harass….

A monthly Canadian Catholic magazine of news, analysis and opinion has been burdened by $20,000 in legal costs in the process of defending itself against a campaign of harassment – including a human rights complaint – launched by homosexualist activists.

Fifteen months after the human rights complaint was filed, CI is still awaiting a ruling from the Canadian Human Rights Commission on whether the matter will proceed beyond the investigation stage. In the meantime the magazine has already racked up $20,000 in legal fees, with no end in sight. Wells, on the other hand, has had all his legal fees covered by the state.

De Valk says that not only does he agree with Mark Steyn that, when it comes to human rights commissions, “the process is the punishment,” but he believes the system is “hopeless” and leaves a significant portion of Canadians who hold traditional values “in terror.” This is especially the case, says de Valk, since the various adjudicators who have been put in charge of the commissions, “all seem to come from one crowd.”

“They’re all people who no longer believe in truth, who believe that hatred is whenever you make me feel uncomfortable. They all have the concept of hatred and comfort mixed up. They no longer believe in the reason of law, the rationale of law, and they certainly don’t believe in the Judeo-Christian tradition.”

Truth, is a deceptive thing, apparently. In other news, black is now the new white.

Pro-Life Ads Pointing Out Fact that in Canada Abortion is Permitted Until Birth are Ruled “Deceptive”
Suppression of ads called “an attempt to silence the pro-life voice from public discussion”

In a bizarre ruling last week, Advertising Standards Canada (ASC) rejected evidence from Statistics Canada and declared that pro-life billboards which said abortions are allowed in Canada throughout all nine months of pregnancy were “deceptive.”

Joanne Byfield, president of LifeCanada, the group behind the billboards, said the decision was unbelievable. “Our ads simply state the reality in Canada that there is no law restricting abortion at any stage of pregnancy. This ruling says it is ‘deceptive’ to tell Canadians that,” she said.

But enough of all this. John 16 v33 seems appropriate:

“I have told you these things, so that in me you may have peace. In this world you will have trouble. But take heart! I have overcome the world.”

Posted in Christian | 4 Comments

New URL

FYI, you can get to this blog by http://theagetocome.com as well as the normal https://theagetocome.wordpress.com now. I thought I’d go buy that domain as it was available. 🙂

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment