Christ alone

This is from something I read in SF recently, and I thought it well worth plagarising for those who have not yet read it:

You say, “I am not satisfied with my love.” What! Did you expect to be so? Is it your love to Christ, or his love to you, that is to bring you peace? God’s free love to sinners, as such, is our resting place. There are two kinds of love in God, – his love of compassion to the unbelieving sinner, and his love of delight and complacency to his believing children. A father’s love to a prodigal child is quite as sincere as his love to his obedient, loving child at home, though it be a different kind. God cannot love you as a believer till you are such. But he loves you as a poor sinner. And it is this love of his to the unloving and unlovable that affords the sinner his first resting place. This free love of God satisfies and attracts him. Herein is love, not that we loved God, but that he loved us.” “We love him because he first loved us.” “God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten Son.”

“I am not satisfied with my repentance,” you say. It is well. What should you have thought of yourself had you been so? What pride and self-righteousness would it indicate, were you saying, “I am satisfied with my repentance, – it is of the proper quality and amount.” If satisfied with it, what would you do with it? Would you ground your peace upon it? Would you pacify your conscience with it? Would you go with it instead of the blood to a holy God? If not, what do you mean by the desire to be satisfied with your repentance before having peace with God?

In short, you are not satisfied with any of your religious feelings; and it is well that you are not; for, if you were, you must have a very high idea of yourself, and a very low idea of what both law and gospel expect of you. You are, I doubt not, right in not being satisfied with the state of your feelings; but what has this to do with the great duty of immediately believing on the Son of God? If the gospel is nothing to you till you have got your feelings all set right, it is no gospel for the sinner at all. But this is its special fitness and glory, that it takes you up at the very point where you are at this moment, and brings you glad tidings in spite of your feelings being altogether wrong.

All these difficulties of yours have their root in the self esteem of our natures, which makes us refuse to be counted altogether sinners, and which shrinks from going to God save with some personal recommendation to make acceptance likely. Utter want of goodness is what we are slow to acknowledge. Give up these attempts to be satisfied with yourself in anything, great or small, faith, feeling, or action. The Holy Spirit’s work in convincing you of sin, is to make you dissatisfied with yourself; and will you pursue a course which can only grieve him away? God can never be satisfied with you on account of any goodness about you; and why should you attempt to be satisfied with anything which will not satisfy him? There is but one thing with which he is entirely satisfied, – the person and work of his only begotten Son. It is with Him that he wants you to be satisfied, not with yourself. How much better would it be to take God’s way at once, and be satisfied with Christ? Then would pardon and peace be given without delay. Then would the favor of God rest upon you. For God has declared, that whoever is satisfied with Christ shall find favor with him. His desire is that you should come to be as one with him in this great thing. He asks nothing of you, save this. But with nothing else than this will he be content, nor will he receive you on any other footing, save that of one who has come to be satisfied with Christ, and with what Christ has done.

Surely all this is simple enough. Does it exactly meet your case? Satisfaction with yourself, even could you get it, would do nothing for you. Satisfaction with Christ would do everything; for Christ is ALL. “This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased.” Be pleased with him in whom the Father is pleased, and all is well.

I suspect that some of those difficulties of yours arise from the secret idea that the gospel is just a sort of modified law, by keeping which you are to be saved. You know that the old law is far above your reach, and that it condemns, but cannot save you. But you think, perhaps, that Christ came to make the law easier, to lower its demands, to make it (as some say) an evangelical law, with milder terms, suited to the sinner’s weakness. That this is blasphemy, a moment’s thought will show you. For it means that the former law was too strict; that is, it was not holy, and just, and good. It denies also Christ’s words, that he came not to destroy but to fulfill the law. God has but one law, and it is perfect; its substance is love to God and man. A milder law must mean an imperfect one; a law that makes God’s one law unnecessary; a law that gives countenance to sin. Will obedience to an imperfect law save the breaker of the perfect law? But faith does not make void the law; it establishes it.

It is by a perfect law that we are saved; else it would be an unholy salvation. It is by a perfect law, fulfilled in every “jot and tittle,” that we are saved; else it would be an unrighteous salvation. The Son of God has kept the law for us; he has magnified it and made it honorable; and thus we have a holy and righteous salvation. Though above law in himself, he was made under the law for us; and by the vicarious law keeping of his spotless life, as well as by endurance unto death of that law’s awful penalties, we are redeemed from the curse of the law. “Christ is the end (the fulfilling and exhausting) of the law, for righteousness to every one that believeth.” FOR CHRIST IS NOT A HELPER, BUT A SAVIOUR. He has not come to enable us to save ourselves, by keeping a mitigated law; but to keep the unmitigated law in our room, that the law might have no claim for penalty, upon any sinner who will only consent to be indebted to the law keeping and law enduring of the divine Surety.

Others of your difficulties spring from confounding the work of the Spirit in us with the work of Christ for us. These two must be kept distinct; for the intermingling of them is the subversion of both. Beware of overlooking either; beware of keeping them at a distance from each other. Though quite distinct, they go hand in hand, inseparably linked together, yet each having its own place and its own office. Your medicine and your physician are not the same, yet they go together. Christ is your medicine, the Spirit is your physician. Do not take the two works as if they were one compounded work; nor try to build your peace upon some mystic gospel which is made up of a strange mixture of the two. Realize both, the outward and the inward; the objective and the subjective; Christ for us, and the Holy Spirit in us.

As at the first, so to the last, must this distinctiveness be observed, lest, having found peace in believing, you lose it by not holding the beginning of your confidence steadfast unto the end. “When I begin to doubt,” writes one, “I quiet my doubts by going back to the place where I got them first quieted; I go and get peace again where I got it at the beginning; I do not sit down gloomily to must over my own faith or unbelief, but over the finished work of Immanuel; I don’t try to reckon up my experiences, to prove that I once was a believer, but I believe again as I did before; I don’t examine the evidence of the Spirit’s work in me, but I think of the sure evidences which I have of Christ’s work for me, in his death, and burial, and resurrection. This is the restoration of my peace. I had begun to look at other objects; I am now recalled from my wanderings to look at Jesus only.”

Posted in Christian | 5 Comments

Albertan weather – not for the fainthearted (the pictorial edition)

A few snaps from my little foray this afternoon:

Jan08_1

Jan08_2

Jan08_3

Jan08_4

Yes Virginia, it really is that cold today.

Posted in Weather | 10 Comments

Albertan weather – not for the fainthearted

I did say that it was possible that my Meteorological past would make a foray into this blog from time to time. This happens to be one of those times. 😉

We in Alberta are about to witness an interesting weather event. You wouldn’t know it from Saturday, as temperatures rose to a balmy 3C (37F) here in Calgary. Sunday, however, is a different story. We’re about to get hit by a very intense Arctic front courtesy of the Siberian
High
coming for a visit.

I thought this map of early next week might give you an idea, you don’t have to be a Meteorologist to get the gist:

Jan08Weather

As an Accuweather blogger put it here, this is the kind of thing Calgary is likely to see this Sunday…

8am Sunday…….-3 celsius (26 F) and partly cloudy

11am Sunday……-5 celsius (23 F) as the Arctic front arrives, wind picks up with some light snow.

Noon Sunday…….-10 celsius (14 F), windy with moderate to heavy snow and blowing snow.

2 pm Sunday…….-16 celsius (3 F), light to moderate snow and blustery.

5 pm Sunday…….-23 celsius (-9 F), light snow.

9 pm Sunday……..-26 celsius (-15 F), light snow.

Noon Monday…….-29 celsius (-20 F), flurries.

Temperatures could fall to -36 to -38 celsius (-32 to -36 F) Monday night and early Tuesday morning!

It’s always fun here in Alberta. 😉

Posted in Weather | 7 Comments

Still here…

..just some (positive) things happening on the work front that is making blogging time limited (there’s that real life getting in the way again, heh). Normal service will hopefully be resumed shortly 😉 .

Update: Got the job, working for a computing consultancy here in Calgary come February, oh and passed an exam too. 🙂

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Community Vision

Below is a transcript of a document Ruthy and I recently put together regarding Community. I’ve created a static page too, as this is something deep on our hearts that I want to keep highlighted here.

Celtic Cross

The need to answer the question ‘How do we live an authentic Christian life in the West today?’ precipitated the vision and heart for Christ-centred Community which came a number of years ago; since childhood for Ruthy and for us as a couple since 1999 when the Lord impressed a vision / desire on both our hearts (incidentally, this vision for community is for us tied into the call to come to Canada which began in 1997). How is it possible to live more simply, and meaningfully, being ‘in the world’ but not trapped or immersed in / by it? As the Northumbria community puts it ‘How then shall we live? How shall we sing the Lord’s song in a strange land?’

The vision given in 1999 has been developing since then. The original call to community left questions unanswered. Community, yes – but to what purpose? What would it look like? Where would it be based? What aim? How would it work…?

To answer these questions, we had to go back a step. What was truly on our hearts? What were we finding so distasteful and false in our present experience of living? It was the blatant shallowness, superficiality, worldliness of our ‘rich’ culture, both in the UK and here in Canada. And sadly, we saw only too clearly that this same spirit extended to the churches, to the fellowship we were part of, and we were not exempt…

In our hearts we felt that this should be different. As scripture shows us, those who are in Christ, should not live this way. How can there be revival, unless there is change, unless the people of God radically embrace the gospel, unless they are seen to be genuinely different, from the heart outwards? How are we any different from our ‘rich’ neighbours, except that we go to church on a Sunday morning? Living in Community, in both vulnerability and availability, sharing with others, welcoming whoever our Father sends was the way God seemed to be answering this for us…

So, in reality, how would we answer this call to Community? We don’t have a complete answer to that yet! Our vision has proved to be an organic, changing thing, yet with a heart that has remained the same – focussed on worshipping Christ, being Bible-centred and living out a simple Rule of life, giving to others out of our plenty, holding all things in common….( which we are sure will be no easy task! )

Only our Father sees and knows what will come of this call; we need to walk with him and trust Him; we are not given the future, just enough for today. It might be, that as our life together is lived and grows, that ‘community’ life within our churches might become more meaningful, might go beyond the ‘house group’ level to a far deeper, sometimes more painful, more real church…

• Where the needs of one are supplied by the plenty of another (Acts 2 v42-47) that offers unconditional hospitality.

• Where there is a deep love for God – Father, Son and Holy Spirit – and for each other.

• That looks outward to bless the poor and helpless, realising that we are also the poor and helpless.

• That daily worships, prays and works together in openness and vulnerability; whether gathered together or ‘gathered’ apart, which would form a rhythm, or rule, to community life.

NC

We see a main facility as being a sort of ‘Mother House’, where a body of us would permanently live, welcoming those whom the Lord sends, for ministry or to minister, to stay for short periods, or for longer, to seek refreshment in order to go back out into the world in mission….Whoever lives there, for however long, would also embrace the daily rule of life and join in the tasks that keep daily life going; the practical on-going kitchen, house, cooking, cleaning, gardening sorts tasks! As well as looking after the library and chapel…And so we all contribute to the life of the community. We live together, pray together and work together, asking the Lord to “establish Thou the work of our hands “.

Many other folk, who also value this simple rule of life will be called to remain in the neighbourhoods and situations where they are now. But they also can be a part of community life by embracing the ethos of being available and vulnerable to God and other people, by using the same Bible readings, daily worship ‘offices’ and periodically visiting the Mother house to offer their time and talents and just to visit.

This would not be a church, or even a parachurch organisation, but a revolution within the life of our churches as they are. All community members would be encouraged to remain within their present church fellowships.

As we view the current state of the world, it occurs to us that there could also be another component to this community, that of rescue. As the world grows darker, so there will need to be beacons of light, offering hope, rescue, a refuge and a home – an oasis in a country where we can no longer talk about “Christmas” or “Jesus” (especially in the schools), where you get in to trouble if you say anything that is perceived to be ‘homophobic’ or if you ‘offend’ anybody’s faith. One can imagine it might not be that long before Christians are discriminated against in the workplace and elsewhere just because they are Christians. Indeed, the need for Christian community would become even greater.

A few years ago the Lord clearly said to Pete; “If you build it they will come”. We have pondered and prayed long and hard over this one, wanting to be obedient yet not impetuous. If this call to community is indeed of God, and we firmly believe it is, then the ‘where’ and ‘how’ and ‘when’ will be of His making and in His time.

Candle in the dark

Posted in Christian | 13 Comments

Court Rules British Airways May Prohibit Crosses but not Symbols of Other Religions

OK, it’s probably best I get this out of my system in one go. Never let it be said that Canada is the only country enshrining political correctness. It’s just as bad, if not worse at home. From here.

LONDON, January 16, 2008 (LifeSiteNews.com) – A court ruling last week concluded that British Airways (BA) did not engage in unlawful discrimination when it suspended an employee for refusing to hide a cross necklace while at work, even though symbols of other religions are permitted.

In October 2006, Nadia Eweida, a Christian who works at the British Airways check-in counter at Heathrow Airport in London, was told that she must either cover up or remove a necklace depicting a small cross. Eweida was placed on unpaid leave when she refused to conceal the cross. British Airways allows employees of other religions, such as Islam and Hinduism, to wear faith-related items, including clothing, jewelry, and religious markings.

When the case originally hit the press in 2006, BA drew criticism from the Church of England, the Vatican and even from Christians leaders in Africa. British politicians and some church leaders threatened to boycott BA, and the Church of England threatened to to sell its £6.6 million worth of BA shares, until BA said it would review the policy.

Eweida lost her initial suit against the company but won an injunction on appeal in the Reading Employment Tribunal. However, in last Tuesday’s ruling in the case, Eweida v. British Airways, the court ruled the airline can continue to prohibit Eweida from visibly wearing her cross. The court concluded that other types of religious symbols, such as turbans, bangles, and other religious markings are unable to be concealed and are therefore acceptable.

The Alliance Defense Fund (ADF) which provided funding for Eweida’s case against the airline, will appeal the ruling.

“Christian employees should not be singled out for discrimination. This decision will be appealed,” said ADF Chief Counsel Benjamin Bull. “According to British Airways, it’s okay for employees to wear a symbol of their faith unless it’s a Christian cross. The airline took no action against employees of other religions who wore jewelry or symbols of their religion. That type of intolerance is inconsistent with the values of civilized communities around the world.”

“No Christian should be forced to hide her faith in the workplace, particularly when a double-standard exists targeting only Christians for discriminatory treatment. This case should be of particular interest to the American customers of British Airways who understand and value religious liberty,” concluded Bull.

There’s lots more where that came from too. I wonder, could we see this as ‘a’ great falling away, or ‘the’ great falling away? Things to ponder. Anyway, I will change tack and get that community post up soon…..

Posted in Christian | 10 Comments

The Canadian Thought Police

I wrote a long article on a case at the Canadian Thought Police a while ago, then deleted it because it was getting too complicated to tell the tale well in a blog post. By Thought Police, I mean the Human Rights Commissions, which were originally set up as a low-level sub-judicial body to intervene in minor matters regarding discrimination based on race, sex etc. The fact that this body has metamorphised into an unaccountable thought police department is indicative of how ill-conceived and ill-executed this body was.

For instance, what did the founders think might happen when they ensured that complainants were publicly funded, while defendants had to pay their own way? And where the only standard of evidence was that there was no standard? In the hands of the politically-correct, these have become powerful weapons indeed, intended and used to chill thoughts or expressions deemed offensive.

I am probably not saying anything that has not been said before when I suggest that agreement with what the defendant has said or wrote is not the issue. With a few obvious restrictions (for instance, one should not be allowed to publicly call for somebody to be murdered) people should be free to say stupid, idiotic and obnoxious things. Generally speaking, these kind of things are self-correcting anyway. People should also be free to offend others, to debate others, to disagree and to make plain their beliefs.

Rather than getting any further into this, you can check out one of the latest cases here – h/t Magistats. The case is made much better than I could make it – I just wanted to give another heads-up regarding an increasingly abusive misuse of power and chilling of free speech here North of the border.

Posted in Uncategorized | 5 Comments

Anglican Wars

When I set up this blog in September 2006, I said I was focusing on two things – firstly the prophetic, but also Anglican affairs.

Well, 2008 comes round and the wars continue unabated, in fact now intensifying. This is an inevitable reality as the Anglican Communion comes unravelled. However, it is certainly an unedifying reality. I look at the constant to and fro of news, claim and counter-claim, bickering, statement and counter-statement, barbs and insults flung far and wide and I find it hard to avoid a feeling of despair.

I would wish that all fault could be found on one side only, and whilst I do believe the lions share can be found with the adherents and proponents of the New Thing, neither side comes out squeaky clean. If indeed there is just one side. More recently there has been a disturbing trend on our ‘side’ for those who differ in tactics regarding the response to the New Thing to spend more time attacking and blaming each other than finding ways to work (and pray!) together, even if that does involve different responses in practice.

I wish I could say it’s getting better. But it isn’t, and won’t – not for some time yet. It’s a little like watching a train-wreck in slow motion.

In the meantime, we have to find some way of living as Anglican Christians without becoming so embroiled in the political and ecclesiastical mess that we lose all sense of charity or perspective. You can see this happening on both sides, where one side’s leaders become demigods, and the other side’s leaders become devils. Of course, reality is much more complicated, but that is what polarised times do.

The question we may have to ask ourselves is this – once all this is over, and the dust settled, what, who and where do we want to be? Are we so defined by the struggle that our vision will not outlast it?

I’m not advocating sticking fingers in ears and loudly shouting “I can’t hear you”. There are decisions that have to be made, and like it or not we are going to have to engage the issues sooner or later. Even not making a decision is making a decision.

I have posted here from time to time on these Anglican Wars, but have really only scraped the edge of everything I could post. This is partly because I’m posting some of that on the Anglican Essentials blog, partly because I don’t want this place to become one round after another of train-wreck reporting.

There are other things going on beyond Anglican Wars (thank God!), and I find it hopeful and uplifting to post some of these. Occasionally, when I look up from my trench, I see the sky is still blue and God is still most certainly in charge. Nothing is happening without His say, and all is unfolding as He calls. The question is as much ‘Who do you want me to be at this time Lord?’ as ‘What do you want me to do at this time Lord?’. I think Lent and Beyond have it about right, with the call to pray, both for friends and enemies. It might take some effort, but it is a blessing for the soul – perhaps sometimes actually blessing oneself more than ones enemies. Like I’ve said before, unforgiveness binds the unforgiver to the unforgiven. It is hard in practice to avoid forgiving those for whom you are praying.

With that said, I hope in the next few days to post something on community, a vision that has been on our hearts a number of years now and that we are now attempting to put down on paper. I believe this is something that is going to become increasingly important in the days ahead.

Posted in Anglican, Christian | 9 Comments

Comic relief

Shamelessly plagiarised from the Muse, I give you some pearls of Wisdom…..

“He had delusions of adequacy.” – Walter Kerr

“He has all the virtues I dislike and none of the vices I admire.” – Winston Churchill

“A modest little person, with much to be modest about.” – Winston Churchill

“I have never killed a man, but I have read many obituaries with great pleasure.” – Clarence Darrow

“He has never been known to use a word that might send a reader to the dictionary.” – William Faulkner (about Ernest Hemingway)

“Poor Faulkner. Does he really think big emotions come from big words?” – Ernest Hemingway (about William Faulkner)

“Thank you for sending me a copy of your book; I’ll waste no time reading it.” – Moses Hadas

“He can compress the most words into the smallest idea of any man I know.” – Abraham Lincoln

“I didn’t attend the funeral, but I sent a nice letter saying I approved of it.” – Mark Twain

“He has no enemies, but is intensely disliked by his friends.” – Oscar Wilde

“I am enclosing two tickets to the first night of my new play; bring a friend…. if you have one.” – George Bernard Shaw to Winston Churchill

“Cannot possibly attend first night, will attend second… if there is one.” – Winston Churchill, in response.

“I feel so miserable without you; it’s almost like having you here.” – Stephen Bishop

“He is a self-made man and worships his creator.” – John Bright

“I’ve just learned about his illness. Let’s hope it’s nothing trivial.” – Irvin S. Cobb

“He is not only dull himself, he is the cause of dullness in others.” – Samuel Johnson

“He is simply a shiver looking for a spine to run up.” – Paul Keating

“There’s nothing wrong with you that reincarnation won’t cure.” – Jack E. Leonard

“He has the attention span of a lightning bolt.” – Robert Redford

“They never open their mouths without subtracting from the sum of human knowledge.” – Thomas Brackett Reed

“In order to avoid being called a flirt, she always yielded easily.” – Charles, Count Talleyrand

“He loves nature in spite of what it did to him.” – Forrest Tucker

“Why do you sit there looking like an envelope without any address on it?” – Mark Twain

“His mother should have thrown him away and kept the stork.” – Mae West

“Some cause happiness wherever they go; others, whenever they go.” – Oscar Wilde

“He uses statistics as a drunken man uses lamp-posts… for support rather than illumination.” – Andrew Lang (1844-1912)

“He has Van Gogh’s ear for music.” – Billy Wilder

“I’ve had a perfectly wonderful evening. But this wasn’t it.” – Groucho Marx

A member of Parliament to Disraeli: “Sir, you will either die on the gallows or of some unspeakable disease.” “That depends, Sir, ” said Disraeli, “on whether I embrace your policies or your mistress.”

One of my favorites (on an officer’s performance assessment – not one of mine, thankfully): “Soldiers will follow this officer, if only out of idle curiosity.

Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments

As an aside to begin the week…..

It’s kind of ironic, considering that in the current Anglican Unpleasantness I and my compatriots are labelled as cultural Neanderthals somewhat to the right of Genghis Kahn, that in this Baptist controversy, I’d probably be labelled as a backslidden apostate liberal wus. 😉

Funny old world.

(Relevant bit here for those who don’t want to click the article):

Many trustees were also angered by Burleson’s harsh criticism of policies enacted in 2005 that require missionary candidates to be baptized in an SBC church and forbid them from speaking in tongues.

The board first moved to unseat Burleson, then withdrew that motion and moved instead to prohibit public criticism of the board and disclosure of its activities in closed sessions.

Calling the baptism and tongues policies “horrible,” Burleson said the tactics used to stifle debate on the decisions compelled him to go public. He believes the dispute revolves around whether the IMB will cooperate with believers from other denominations.

“The issue is narrowness of doctrine,” Burleson said. “Basically [the two policies] are saying, ‘We’ll tell you who a true Baptist is and what [he or she] looks like. That’s fundamentalism with a capital F. Fundamentalism must be stopped in the SBC.”

Posted in Anglican, Christian | 2 Comments